37
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions
and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations
of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition
of the company’s assets that could
have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising
from the current period audit of the
consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to
be communicated to the audit
committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material
to the consolidated financial
statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or
complex judgments. The
communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on
the consolidated
financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating
the critical audit matter below,
providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts
or disclosures to which it
relates.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - Store Location Asset Groupings
As described in Notes 1 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements,
the Company’s consolidated
property and equipment, net balance was $53.7 million, of which the store
locations were a portion, and
consolidated operating lease right-of-use assets, net balance was $153.9 million
as of January 31, 2026.
The Company invests in leaseholds, right-of-use assets and equipment,
primarily in connection with the
opening and remodeling of stores, and in computer software and hardware.
The Company periodically
reviews its store locations and estimates the recoverability
of its long-lived assets, which primarily relate
to fixtures and equipment, leasehold improvements, right-of-use assets net
of lease liabilities, and
information technology equipment and software. An impairment charge is recorded
for the amount by
which the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value when management
determines that projected
cash flows associated with those long-lived assets will not be sufficient to recover
the carrying value. This
determination is based on a number of factors, including the store’s historical operating results and future
projected cash flows, which include contribution margin projections. The Company
assesses the fair value
of each lease by considering market rents and any lease terms that may
adjust market rents under certain
conditions such as the loss of an anchor tenant or a leased space in a shopping
center not meeting certain
criteria. An impairment charge for store assets of $0.2 million was recorded during
the year ended
The principal considerations for our determination that performing
procedures relating to impairment of
long-lived assets – store location asset groupings is a critical audit matter
are (i) the significant judgment
by management when determining the fair value measurement of the
store location asset groupings,
which led to (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and
evaluating management’s projected cash flow assumptions related to contribution margin projections.