---

 

---

 

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, Reports on Form 8-K:

*Previously Filed

---

 

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

ITEM 8, ITEM 14(a), (1) AND (2), (c) AND (d)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CERTAIN EXHIBITS

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2003

THE CATO CORPORATION

CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

---

 

Item 14(a) 1. And 2. List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule:

THE CATO CORPORATION

The following consolidated financial statements of The Cato Corporation are included in Item 8:

The following consolidated financial statement schedule of the Cato Corporation is included in Item 14 (d):

---

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Cato Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Cato Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2003. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth herein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
April 21, 2003

---

 

The Cato Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

---

 

The Cato Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

---

 

The Cato Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

---

 

The Cato Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

* Total comprehensive income for the years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001 was $46,653, $43,403 and $39,944, respectively.

---

 

The Cato Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Cato Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“the Company”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Description of Business and Fiscal Year: The Company has two business segments - - the operation of women’s fashion specialty stores and a credit card division. The apparel specialty stores operate under the names “Cato”, “Cato Fashions”, “Cato Plus” and “It’s Fashion!” and are located primarily in strip shopping centers in the Southeast.

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest January 31. Fiscal years 2002 and 2001 each included 52 weeks. Fiscal year 2000 included 53 weeks.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Company’s financial statements include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, reserves relating to workers’ compensation, general and auto insurance liabilities and reserves for inventory markdowns.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments: Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Investments with original maturities beyond three months are classified as short-term investments. The fair values of short-term investments are based on quoted market prices.

The Company’s short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale. As they are available for current operations, they are classified in consolidated balance sheets as current assets. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and temporary losses, net of income taxes, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Other than temporary declines in fair value of investments are recorded as a reduction in the cost of the investments in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and a reduction of interest and other income, net in the accompanying Statements of Consolidated Income. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. The amortization of premiums, accretion of discounts and realized gains and losses are included in other income.

Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash equivalents with high credit qualified institutions and, by practice, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution. Concentrations of credit risks with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the dispersion across different geographies of the Company’s customer base.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information: Income tax payments, net of refunds received, for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001 were $21,982,000, $24,841,000 and $17,435,000, respectively. Additionally, for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002, the Company accepted in an option transaction from an officer for payment of an option exercise,48,681 mature shares of Class A Common Stock for $1,144,500 or $23.51 per share, the average fair market value on the date of exchange and 92,600 mature shares of Class A Common Stock for $1,825,000 or $19.71 per share, the average fair market value on the date of exchange, respectively.

Inventories: Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market as determined by the retail method.

Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. The Company accounts for its software development costs in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (“SOP”) 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use”. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, as follows:

---

 

Retail Sales: Revenues from retail sales, net of returns, are recognized upon delivery of the merchandise to the customer and exclude sales taxes.

Advertising: Advertising costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Advertising expense was $5,299,000, $4,563,000 and $5,812,000 for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001, respectively.

Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share excludes dilution of stock options and is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of Class A and Class B common shares outstanding for the respective periods. The weighted-average number of shares used in the basic earnings per share computations was 25,465,543, 25,193,610 and 24,988,844 for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001, respectively. The weighted-average number of shares representing the dilutive effect of stock options was 481,914, 695,026 and 476,388 for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001, respectively. The weighted-average number of shares used in the diluted earnings per share computations was 25,947,457, 25,888,636 and 25,465,232 for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001, respectively.

Vendor Allowances: The Company receives certain allowances from vendors primarily related to purchase discounts and markdown allowances. These allowances are reflected in gross margin at the time they are earned.

Income Taxes: The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. Income taxes are provided based on the asset and liability method of accounting, whereby deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities.

Store Opening and Closing Costs: Costs relating to the opening of new stores or the relocating or expanding of existing stores are expensed as incurred. The Company evaluates all long-lived assets for impairment. Impairment losses are recognized when expected future cash flows from the use of the asset groups are less than the asset groups’ carrying values.

Closed Store Lease Obligations: At the time stores are closed, provisions are made for the rentals required to be paid over the remaining lease terms. Rentals due the Company under non-cancelable subleases are offset against the related obligations in the year the sublease is signed. There is no offset for assumed sublease revenues.

Insurance: The Company is self-insured with respect to employee health, workers compensation and general liability claims. Employee health claims are funded through a VEBA trust to which the Company makes periodic contributions. The Company has stop-loss insurance coverage for individual claims in excess of $250,000.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The Company’s carrying values of financial instruments, such as cash and cash equivalents, approximate their fair values due to their short terms to maturity and/or their variable interest rates.

Stock-based Compensation: The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for stock-based compensation where the option price of the stock approximated the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Had compensation expense for fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000 stock options granted been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, the Company’s net income and basic and diluted earnings per share amounts for fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000 would approximate the following proforma amounts (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

---

 

* determined using fair value method

Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. In June 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 138, which amended certain provisions of SFAS 133. The Company adopted SFAS 133 and the corresponding amendments under SFAS 138 on February 4, 2001, and the adoption of this statement had no impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. SFAS 142 includes requirements to test goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment rather than amortize them. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on February 3, 2002, and the adoption of this statement had no impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position, as the Company had no goodwill or other indefinite lived intangible assets.

In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards (SFAS) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. SFAS No. 144 supercedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of” and Accounting Principles Bulletin (APB) No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions”. Along with establishing a single accounting model, based on the framework established in SFAS No. 121 for impairment of long-lived assets, this standard retains the basic provisions of APB No. 30 for the presentation of discontinued operations in the income statement, but broadens that presentation to include a component of the entity. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 on February 3, 2002, and the adoption of this statement had no impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Correction”. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, “Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt”, and an amendment of that statement, SFAS No. 64, “Extinguishment of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements”. Because of the rescission of SFAS No. 4, the gains and losses from the extinguishments of debt are no longer required to be classified as extraordinary items. SFAS No. 145 amends SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases”, to require sale-leaseback accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. The amendment of SFAS No. 13 is effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002. There has been no impact to the Company due to the Amendment of SFAS No. 13. Lastly, SFAS No. 145 makes various technical corrections to existing pronouncements that are not substantive in nature. The Company adopted SFAS No. 145 in fiscal 2002 and the impact on its financial position and results of operations of the adoption was not material.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS no. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. This statement is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Liabilities for costs associated with an exit activity should be initially measured at fair value, when incurred. This statement applies to costs associated with an exit activity that does not involve the entity newly acquired in a business combination or a disposal activity covered by SFAS No. 144. The Company adopted SFAS No. 146 on December 31, 2002, and the adoption of this statement had no impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.

---

 

On November 25, 2002 the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”, which elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor about its obligations under certain guarantees issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The interpretation expands on the accounting guidance of SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, SFAS No. 57, “Related Party Disclosures”, and SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”. The interpretation also incorporates, without change, the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 34, “Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”, which it supersedes. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of Interpretation No. 45 apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, regardless of the guarantor’s fiscal year-end. The disclosures are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 31, 2002. Although the Company has some guarantees with its subsidiaries, the Company does not believe the impact of this Interpretation on its financial position or result of operations will be material or that additional disclosure is required.

On December 31, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure”. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, to provide for alternative methods of transition to SFAS No. 123’s fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 and APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to require disclosure in the summary of significant policies of the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per-share in annual and interim financial statements. While SFAS No. 148 does not amend SFAS No. 123 to require companies to account for employee stock options using the fair value method, the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 are applicable to all companies with stock-based compensation, regardless of whether they account for that compensation using the fair value method of SFAS No. 123 or the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. SFAS No. 148’s amendment of the transition and annual disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The implementation of this Statement did not materially affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Cash Considerations Received from a Vendor”. EITF Issue No. 02-16 provides guidance on how cash considerations received by a customer or reseller should be classified in the customer’s statement of earnings. EITF Issue No. 02-16 is effective for all transactions with vendors after December 31, 2002. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 02-16 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements”. This interpretation applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, to variable interest entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest it acquired before February 1, 2003. This interpretation may be applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date on which it is first applied or by restating previously issued financial statements for one or more years with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the first year restated. The implementation of this interpretation will not materially affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements for prior fiscal years to conform with presentation for fiscal 2002.

2. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS:

Short-term investments at February 1, 2003 include the following (in thousands):

Short-term investments at February 2, 2002 include the following (in thousands):

---

 

The accumulated unrealized gains in short-term investments at February 1, 2003 of $265,000 net of a deferred income tax liability of $149,000 offset by the accumulated unrealized losses in equity investments of $12,000 net of a deferred income tax benefit of $6,000 and the accumulated unrealized losses of February 2, 2002 of $567,000, net of a deferred income tax benefit of $305,000, are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive gains (losses) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a write-down of $1.8 million in market value on investments with other than temporary declines in fair value.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at February 1, 2003, by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands):

Additionally, the Company had $1.7 million invested in privately managed investment funds at February 1, 2003, which are reported under other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE:

Accounts receivable consist of the following (in thousands):

Finance charge and late charge revenue on customer deferred payment accounts totaled $13,672,000, $12,951,000 and $13,689,000 for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001, respectively, and the provision for doubtful accounts was $4,764,000, $5,913,000 and $5,292,000, for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001, respectively. The provision for doubtful accounts is classified as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.

4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):

---

 

As of February 1, 2003, the Company has capitalized $25.7 million for an enterprise-wide merchandise and finance system in accordance with SOP 98-1.

Construction in progress primarily represents investments in technology and ongoing store development activities scheduled to be implemented over the next 12 months.

5. ACCRUED EXPENSES:

Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):

6. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS:

At February 1, 2003, the Company had an unsecured revolving credit agreement which provided for borrowings of up to $35 million. The revolving credit agreement is committed until October 2004. The credit agreement contains various financial covenants and limitations, including the maintenance of specific financial ratios with which the Company was in compliance. There were no borrowings outstanding during the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003 or February 2, 2002.

The Company had approximately $6,496,000 and $4,314,000 at February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002, respectively, of outstanding irrevocable letters of credit relating to purchase commitments.

7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

The holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share, whereas the holders of Class B Common Stock are entitled to ten votes per share. Each share of Class B Common Stock may be converted at any time into one share of Class A Common Stock. Subject to the rights of the holders of any shares of Preferred Stock that may be outstanding at the time, in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to receive a preferential distribution of $1.00 per share of the net assets of the Company. Cash dividends on the Class B Common Stock cannot be paid unless cash dividends of at least an equal amount are paid on the Class A Common Stock.

The Company’s charter provides that shares of Class B Common Stock may be transferred only to certain “Permitted Transferees” consisting generally of the lineal descendants of holders of Class B Stock, trusts for their benefit, corporations and partnerships

---

 

controlled by them and the Company’s employee benefit plans. Any transfer of Class B Common Stock in violation of these restrictions, including a transfer to the Company, results in the automatic conversion of the transferred shares of Class B Common Stock held by the transferee into an equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock.

In October 1993, the Company registered 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock available for issuance under an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”). In May 1998, the shareholders approved an amendment to the Plan to increase the maximum number of Class A shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued from 250,000 to 500,000 shares. In February 2003, the Board of Directors recommended a new plan be adopted effective October 2003 and that an additional 250,000 shares be registered, subject to shareholder approval. Under the terms of the Plan, substantially all employees may purchase Class A Common Stock through payroll deductions of up to 10% of their salary. The Class A Common Stock is purchased at the lower of 85% of market value on the first or last business day of a six-month payment period. Additionally, each April 15, employees are given the opportunity to make a lump sum purchase of up to $10,000 of Class A Common Stock at 85% of market value. The number of shares purchased by participants through the plan were 32,487 shares, 38,463 shares and 44,500 shares for the years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001, respectively.

The Company has an Incentive Stock Option Plan and a Non- Qualified Stock Option Plan for key employees of the Company. Total shares issuable under the plans are 3,900,000, of which 825,000 shares are issuable under the Incentive Stock Option Plan and 3,075,000 shares are issuable under the Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan. The purchase price of the shares under the option must be at least 100 percent of the fair market value of Class A Common Stock at the date of the grant. Options granted under these plans vest over a 5-year period and expire 10 years after the date of the grant unless otherwise expressly authorized by the Board of Directors.

In August 1999, the Board of Directors adopted the 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan, of which 1,000,000 shares are issuable. No awards may be granted after July 31, 2004 and shares must be exercised within 10 years of the grant date unless otherwise authorized by the Board of Directors.

In August 1999, the Board of Directors granted under the 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan, restricted stock awards of 100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, with a per share fair value of $11.81 to a key executive. In May 2002, the Board of Directors approved and granted under the 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan restricted stock awards of 100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, with a per share fair value of $27.31 to a key executive. These stock awards cliff vest after four years and the unvested portion is included in stockholders’ equity as unearned compensation in the accompanying financial statements. The charge to compensation expense for these stock awards was $750,000, $295,000 and $295,000 in fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Option plan activity for the three fiscal years ended February 1, 2003 is set forth below:

---

 

The following tables summarize stock option information at February 1, 2003:

Outstanding options at February 1, 2003 covered 717,000 shares of Class B Common Stock and 724,950 shares of Class A Common Stock. Outstanding options at February 2, 2002 covered 889,500 shares of Class B Common Stock and 865,750 shares of Class A Common Stock. Options available to be granted under the option plans were 421,618 at February 1, 2003 and 452,418 at February 2, 2002.

The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for stock-based compensation where the option price of the stock approximated the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Had compensation expense for fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000 stock options granted been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, the Company’s net income and basic and diluted earnings per share amounts for fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000 would approximate the following proforma amounts (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

* determined using fair value method

The weighted-average fair value of each option granted during fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000 is estimated at $8.29, $8.19 and $5.45 per share, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions for grants issued in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively: expected dividend yield of 3.29%, 2.62% and 2.42%; expected volatility of 57.06%, 59.84% and 60.34%, adjusted for expected dividends; risk-free interest rate of 2.60%, 4.36% and 4.71%; and an expected life of 5 years for 2002, 2001 and 2000. The effects of applying SFAS 123 in this proforma disclosure are not indicative of

---

 

future amounts.

In May 2002, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend by 11% from $.135 per share to $.15 per share.

Total comprehensive income for the years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001 is as follows (in thousands):

8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:

The Company has a defined contribution retirement savings plan (401(k)) which covers all employees who meet minimum age and service requirements. The 401(k) plan allows participants to contribute up to 60% of their annual compensation up to the maximum elective deferral, designated by the IRS. The Company is obligated to make a minimum contribution to cover plan administrative expenses. Further Company contributions are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company’s contributions for the years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001 were approximately $1,906,000, $2,596,000 and $2,348,000, respectively.

The Company has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), which covers substantially all employees who meet minimum age and service requirements. The Board of Directors determines contributions to the ESOP. No contributions were made to the ESOP for the years ended February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 or February 3, 2001.

The Company is self-insured with respect to employee health, workers compensation and general liability claims. The Company has stop-loss insurance coverage for individual claims in excess of $250,000 for workers compensation and employee health and $100,000 for general liability. Employee health claims are funded through a VEBA trust to which the Company makes periodic contributions. Contributions to the VEBA trust were $8,970,000, $9,090,000 and $6,964,000 in fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

9. LEASES:

The Company has operating lease arrangements for store facilities and equipment. Facility leases generally are for periods of five years with renewal options and most provide for additional contingent rentals based on a percentage of store sales in excess of stipulated amounts. Equipment leases are generally for three to seven year periods.

The minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are (in thousands):

The following schedule shows the composition of total rental expense for all leases (in thousands):

---

 

10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

The Company leases certain of its stores from entities in which Mr. George S. Currin, a director of the Company, has an ownership interest. Rent expense and related charges totaling $883,367, $785,936 and $523,853 were paid in fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, under these leases.

During 2000, 2001, 2002 and the first quarter of 2003, the Company made payments totaling $59,017, $70,651, $115,069 and $92,122 for the benefit of entities in which Mr. Wayland H. Cato, Jr., Chairman of the Board, and Mr. Edgar T. Cato, Former Vice Chairman of the Board and Co-Founder and Director, have a material interest. These payments were charged to expense in the periods indicated. The Company subsequently determined these payments were unrelated to the business of the Company. In April 2003, $362,557, including interest of $25,698, was reimbursed to the Company.

11. INCOME TAXES:

The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002 are as follows (in thousands):

---

 

The reconciliation of the Company’s effective income tax rate with the statutory rate is as follows:

12. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):

Summarized quarterly financial results are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

(1)

For the first three quarters of 2002, the Company reported interest and dividend income of $1,150, $1,673 and $1,147, respectively, as part of total revenues. Such amounts have been reclassified outside of total revenues. This reclassification had no impact on Income before income taxes or Net Income.

(2)

For the four quarters of 2001, the Company reported interest and dividend income of $1,784, $1,611, $1,827 and $1,115, respectively, as part of total revenues. Such amounts have been reclassified outside of total revenues. This reclassification had no impact on Income before income taxes or Net Income.

13. REPORTABLE SEGMENT INFORMATION:

The Company has two reportable segments: retail and credit. The Company operates its women’s fashion specialty retail stores in 26 states, principally in the Southeast. The Company offers its own credit card to its customers and all credit authorizations, payment processing, and collection efforts are performed by a separate subsidiary of the Company.

---

 

The following schedule summarizes certain segment information (in thousands):

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes. The Company does not allocate certain corporate expenses or income taxes to the segments.

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Workers compensation and general liability claims are settled through a claims administrator and are limited by stop-loss insurance coverage for individual claims in excess of $250,000 and $100,000, respectively. The Company paid claims of $1,652,000, $1,379,000 and $1,486,000 in fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company had no outstanding letters of credit relating to such claims at February 1, 2003 or at February 2, 2002. See Note 6 for letters of credit related to purchase commitments, Note 8 for 401(k) plan contribution obligations and Note 9 for lease commitments.

The Company is a defendant in legal proceedings considered to be in the normal course of business and none of which, singularly or collectively, are considered to be material to the Company as a whole.

---

 

SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(a)

Deducted from trade accounts receivable.

(b)

Provision for the difference between costs and revenues from non-cancelable subleases over the lease terms of closed stores.

(c)

Uncollectible accounts written off.

(d)

Recoveries of amounts previously written off.

---

 

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, The Cato Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

The Cato Corporation

Date: April 19, 2004

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:

---

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

*Previously Filed

                                                                         Page 26

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-96283 on Form S-8 pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1999 Incentive
Compensation Plan, in Registration Statement No. 33-41314 on Form S-8 pertaining
to The Cato Corporation 1987 Incentive Stock Option Plan, in Registration
Statement No. 33-41315 on Form S-8 pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1987
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, and in Registration Statement Nos. 33-69844 and
333-96285 on Forms S-8 pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1993 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, of our report dated April 21, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of The Cato
Corporation included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2003.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina

April 19, 2004

                                                                         Page 27

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1


                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, John P. Derham Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
The Cato Corporation, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Cato Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting.


Date:  April 19, 2004


/s/  John P. Derham Cato
- ----------------------------------------
John P. Derham Cato
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer

                                                                         Page 28

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael O. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of The Cato Corporation, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Cato Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting.


Date:  April 19, 2004


/s/  Michael O. Moore
- ----------------------------------------
Michael O. Moore
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

                                                                         Page 29

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, John P. Derham Cato,, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The
Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:

1.  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
February 1, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 19, 2004



                                        /s/  John P. Derham Cato
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John P. Derham Cato
                                        Chairman, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                                                         Page 30

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Michael O. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this
Certification:

1.  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
February 1, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 19, 1004



                                        /s/  Michael O. Moore
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael O. Moore
                                        Executive Vice President
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary