UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
||
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2011 |
||
|
||
OR |
||
|
||
[ ] |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
||
For the transition period from ________________to__________________ |
||
Commission file number 1-31340 |
THE CATO CORPORATION |
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
|
|
Delaware |
56-0484485 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
8100 Denmark Road, Charlotte, North Carolina 28273-5975 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(704) 554-8510 |
|
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
|
|
|
Not Applicable |
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes |
X |
No |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes |
|
No |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes |
|
No |
X |
As of May 26, 2011, there were 27,751,515 shares of Class A common stock and 1,743,525 shares of Class B common stock outstanding.
THE CATO CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
Quarter Ended April 30, 2011
|
Page No. |
||||
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income |
2 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
3 |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
4 |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
5 – 16 |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
17 – 23 |
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
24 |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
24 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
25 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
25 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
25 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
25 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
26 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
26 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
26 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
27 - 32 |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
1
THE CATO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
||||
|
April 30, 2011 |
|
May 1, 2010 |
||
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
||
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
||||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail sales |
$ |
270,933 |
|
$ |
259,040 |
Other income (principally finance charges, late fees and |
|
|
|
|
|
layaway charges) |
|
2,727 |
|
|
2,923 |
Total revenues |
|
273,660 |
|
|
261,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES, NET |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation shown below) |
|
158,405 |
|
|
149,860 |
Selling, general and administrative (exclusive of depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
shown below) |
|
63,316 |
|
|
68,080 |
Depreciation |
|
5,404 |
|
|
5,271 |
Interest and other income |
|
(957) |
|
|
(892) |
Cost and expenses, net |
|
226,168 |
|
|
222,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
47,492 |
|
|
39,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
16,971 |
|
|
14,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ |
30,521 |
|
$ |
25,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
$ |
1.04 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
$ |
1.04 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
$ |
0.185 |
|
$ |
0.165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ |
30,521 |
|
$ |
25,034 |
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
of deferred income tax benefit |
|
274 |
|
|
(87) |
Comprehensive income |
$ |
30,795 |
|
$ |
24,947 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
THE CATO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2011 |
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|||
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
81,173 |
|
$ |
48,630 |
|
$ |
53,731 |
Short-term investments |
|
180,113 |
|
|
181,395 |
|
|
166,404 |
Restricted cash and investments |
|
4,818 |
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
2,565 |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,861, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3,230 and $2,985 at April 30, 2011, May 1, 2010 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 respectively |
|
39,694 |
|
|
39,703 |
|
|
40,742 |
Merchandise inventories |
|
125,182 |
|
|
144,028 |
|
|
114,540 |
Deferred income taxes |
|
3,513 |
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
7,875 |
Prepaid expenses |
|
5,108 |
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
5,006 |
Total Current Assets |
|
439,601 |
|
|
425,441 |
|
|
390,863 |
Property and equipment – net |
|
98,476 |
|
|
99,773 |
|
|
101,469 |
Other assets |
|
7,582 |
|
|
7,545 |
|
|
7,541 |
Total Assets |
$ |
545,659 |
|
$ |
532,759 |
|
$ |
499,873 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
$ |
92,513 |
|
$ |
103,898 |
|
$ |
85,671 |
Accrued expenses |
|
36,021 |
|
|
35,318 |
|
|
34,457 |
Accrued bonus and benefits |
|
6,924 |
|
|
22,841 |
|
|
12,895 |
Accrued income taxes |
|
28,384 |
|
|
11,861 |
|
|
26,516 |
Total Current Liabilities |
|
163,842 |
|
|
173,918 |
|
|
159,539 |
Deferred income taxes |
|
9,540 |
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
7,254 |
Other noncurrent liabilities (primarily deferred rent) |
|
14,749 |
|
|
15,287 |
|
|
16,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies: |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $100 par value per share, 100,000 shares authorized, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none issued |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Class A common stock, $.033 par value per share, 50,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares authorized; issued 27,657,989 shares, 27,844,023 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 27,758,123 shares at April 30, 2011, May 1, 2010 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011, respectively |
|
922 |
|
|
925 |
|
|
928 |
Convertible Class B common stock, $.033 par value per share, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000,000 shares authorized; issued 1,743,525 shares at April 30, 2011, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2010 and January 29, 2011, respectively |
|
58 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
58 |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
69,294 |
|
|
68,537 |
|
|
65,706 |
Retained earnings |
|
286,705 |
|
|
264,218 |
|
|
249,473 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
549 |
|
|
276 |
|
|
447 |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
|
357,528 |
|
|
334,014 |
|
|
316,612 |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |
$ |
545,659 |
|
$ |
532,759 |
|
$ |
499,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
THE CATO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||
|
April 30, 2011 |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
||
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ |
30,521 |
|
$ |
25,034 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided |
|
|
|
|
|
|
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
5,404 |
|
|
5,271 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
530 |
|
|
824 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
506 |
|
|
493 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
(34) |
|
|
(82) |
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
|
283 |
|
|
53 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(used) cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
(521) |
|
|
(1,412) |
|
Merchandise inventories |
|
18,846 |
|
|
15,108 |
|
Prepaid and other assets |
|
(1,920) |
|
|
(1,768) |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
16,557 |
|
|
15,659 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
(27,137) |
|
|
(25,729) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
43,035 |
|
|
33,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property and equipment |
|
(4,391) |
|
|
(4,024) |
|
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
(9,374) |
|
|
(35,960) |
|
Sales of short-term investments |
|
11,052 |
|
|
17,347 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
8 |
|
|
10 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(2,705) |
|
|
(22,627) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
(5,458) |
|
|
(4,882) |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
(2,583) |
|
|
(3,111) |
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan |
|
220 |
|
|
192 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
34 |
|
|
82 |
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
- |
|
|
241 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(7,787) |
|
|
(7,478) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
32,543 |
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
48,630 |
|
|
50,385 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ |
81,173 |
|
$ |
53,731 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
NOTE 1 - GENERAL:
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the accounting records of The Cato Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), and all amounts shown as of and for the periods ended April 30, 2011 and May 1, 2010 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature unless otherwise noted. The results of the interim period may not be indicative of the results expected for the entire year.
The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. Amounts as of January 29, 2011, have been derived from the audited balance sheet other than the retrospective application of the change in accounting principal.
On May 26, 2011, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend by 24% from $.185 per share to $.23 per share or an annualized rate of $.92 per share.
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE:
The Company elected to change its method of accounting for inventory to the weighted average cost method from the retail method effective January 30, 2011. In accordance with ASC 250 “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, all periods have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of the change to the weighted average cost method. The company believes that the weighted average cost method better matches cost of sales with related sales, as well as having an inventory valuation that more closely reflects the acquisition cost of inventory by valuing inventory on a unit basis verses the product department level under the retail method. The cumulative adjustment as of January 31, 2010, was an increase in inventory of $11.7 million and an increase in retained earnings of $7.3 million.
Additionally, the Company has changed the classification for certain balance sheet items to conform to the 2011 presentation. This change in classification will reduce accounts payable and inventory by $1.6 million as of January 29, 2011 and $0.6 million as of May 1, 2010.
In addition, the Company has changed the classification of certain prior year first quarter income statement items to conform to the 2011 presentation. The change has no effect on net income; however, it does reduce retail sales by $720,000, cost of goods sold by $241,000 and selling, general and administrative expense by $479,000.
5
As a result of this retrospective application of the change in accounting principle and the change in the classification of the Balance Sheet, the following items in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets have been adjusted as follows: |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
||||||||
|
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
|
As Previously Reported |
|
Total Changes |
|
As Adjusted |
||||
Merchandise inventories |
$ |
132,020 |
|
$ |
12,008 |
|
$ |
144,028 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
5,001 |
|
|
(1,341) |
|
|
3,660 |
|
Total Current Assets |
|
414,774 |
|
|
10,667 |
|
|
425,441 |
|
Total Assets |
|
522,092 |
|
|
10,667 |
|
|
532,759 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
105,526 |
|
|
(1,628) |
|
|
103,898 |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
175,546 |
|
|
(1,628) |
|
|
173,918 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
5,695 |
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
9,540 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
255,768 |
|
|
8,450 |
|
|
264,218 |
|
Total Stockholders' Equity |
|
325,564 |
|
|
8,450 |
|
|
334,014 |
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |
$ |
522,092 |
|
$ |
10,667 |
|
$ |
532,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|||||||
|
(Unaudited) |
|||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||
|
As Previously Reported |
|
Total Changes |
|
As Adjusted |
|||
Merchandise inventories |
$ |
106,710 |
|
$ |
7,830 |
|
$ |
114,540 |
Deferred income taxes |
|
7,821 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
7,875 |
Total Current Assets |
|
382,979 |
|
|
7,884 |
|
|
390,863 |
Total Assets |
|
491,989 |
|
|
7,884 |
|
|
499,873 |
Accounts payable |
|
86,267 |
|
|
(596) |
|
|
85,671 |
Total Current Liabilities |
|
160,135 |
|
|
(596) |
|
|
159,539 |
Deferred income taxes |
|
4,086 |
|
|
3,168 |
|
|
7,254 |
Retained earnings |
|
244,161 |
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
249,473 |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
|
311,300 |
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
316,612 |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |
$ |
491,989 |
|
$ |
7,884 |
|
$ |
499,873 |
6
As a result of this retrospective application of the change in accounting principle and the change in the classification of the Income Statement, the following items in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows have been adjusted as follows: |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
|
May 1, 2010 |
||||||||
|
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
||||||||
|
As Previously Reported |
|
Total Changes |
|
As Adjusted |
||||
Retail Sales |
$ |
259,760 |
|
$ |
(720) |
|
$ |
259,040 |
|
Total Revenues |
|
262,683 |
|
|
(720) |
|
|
261,963 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
146,854 |
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
149,860 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
68,559 |
|
|
(479) |
|
|
68,080 |
|
Cost and expenses, net |
|
219,792 |
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
222,319 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
42,891 |
|
|
(3,247) |
|
|
39,644 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
15,831 |
|
|
(1,221) |
|
|
14,610 |
|
Net income |
$ |
27,060 |
|
$ |
(2,026) |
|
$ |
25,034 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
$ |
0.92 |
|
$ |
(0.07) |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
$ |
0.92 |
|
$ |
(0.07) |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|||||||
|
May 1, 2010 |
|||||||
|
(Unaudited) |
|||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||
|
As Previously Reported |
|
Total Changes |
|
As Adjusted |
|||
Cash flow from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ |
27,060 |
|
$ |
(2,026) |
|
$ |
25,034 |
Merchandise inventories |
|
11,918 |
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
15,108 |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other liabilities |
$ |
(24,565) |
|
$ |
(1,164) |
|
$ |
(25,729) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
NOTE 2 - EARNINGS PER SHARE:
ASC 260 – Earnings Per Share requires dual presentation of basic and diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) on the face of all income statements for all entities with complex capital structures. The Company has presented one basic EPS and one diluted EPS amount for all common shares in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. While the Company’s certificate of incorporation provides the right for the Board of Directors to declare dividends on Class A shares without declaration of commensurate dividends on Class B shares, the Company has historically paid the same dividends to both Class A and Class B shareholders and the Board of Directors has resolved to continue this practice. Accordingly, the Company’s allocation of income for purposes of the EPS computation is the same for Class A and Class B shares and the EPS amounts reported herein are applicable to both Class A and Class B shares.
Basic EPS is computed as net income less earnings allocated to non-vested equity awards divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|||
|
|
|
April 30, 2011 |
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|||
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
30,521 |
|
$ |
25,034 |
Earnings allocated to non-vesting equity awards |
|
|
(524) |
|
|
(420) |
Net earnings available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
29,997 |
|
$ |
24,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
28,946,814 |
|
|
29,014,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
30,521 |
|
$ |
25,034 |
Earnings allocated to non-vesting equity awards |
|
|
(524) |
|
|
(420) |
Net earnings available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
29,997 |
|
$ |
24,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
28,946,814 |
|
|
29,014,934 |
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
6,344 |
|
|
12,686 |
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
28,953,158 |
|
|
29,027,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
NOTE 3 - SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income tax payments, net of refunds received, for the three months ended April 30, 2011 and May 1, 2010 were $416,000 and $188,000, respectively.
8
NOTE 4 – FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS:
As of April 30, 2011, the Company had an unsecured revolving credit agreement of $35.0 million. The revolving credit agreement is committed until August 2013. The credit agreement contains various financial covenants and limitations, including the maintenance of specific financial ratios with which the Company was in compliance as of April 30, 2011. There were no borrowings outstanding under this credit facility during the three months ended April 30, 2011 or May 1, 2010. Interest on any borrowings is based on LIBOR, which was 0.21% at April 30, 2011.
At April 30, 2011 and May 1, 2010 the Company had approximately $2.9 million and $4.4 million, respectively, of outstanding irrevocable letters of credit relating to purchase commitments.
NOTE 5 – REPORTABLE SEGMENT INFORMATION:
The Company has two reportable segments: retail and credit. The Company operated its fashion specialty retail stores in 31 states at April 30, 2011, principally in the southeastern United States. The Company offers its own credit card to its customers and all related credit authorizations, payment processing, and collection efforts are performed by a separate subsidiary of the Company.
The following schedule summarizes certain segment information (in thousands):
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2011 |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
271,708 |
|
$ |
1,952 |
|
$ |
273,660 |
Depreciation |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5,404 |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(957) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(957) |
Income before taxes |
|
|
46,853 |
|
|
639 |
|
|
47,492 |
Total assets |
|
|
470,141 |
|
|
75,518 |
|
|
545,659 |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
4,346 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
259,741 |
|
$ |
2,222 |
|
$ |
261,963 |
Depreciation |
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
5,271 |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(892) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(892) |
Income before taxes |
|
|
39,015 |
|
|
629 |
|
|
39,644 |
Total assets |
|
|
426,840 |
|
|
73,033 |
|
|
499,873 |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
4,024 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,024 |
The Company evaluates segment performance based on income before taxes. The Company does not allocate certain corporate expenses or income taxes to the credit segment.
9
NOTE 5 – REPORTABLE SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED):
The following schedule summarizes the direct expenses of the credit segment which are reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|||
|
|
April 30, 2011 |
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debt expense |
$ |
530 |
|
$ |
823 |
Payroll |
|
242 |
|
|
235 |
Postage |
|
201 |
|
|
228 |
Other expenses |
|
336 |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
$ |
1,309 |
|
$ |
1,587 |
NOTE 6 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:
As of April 30, 2011, the Company had three long-term compensation plans pursuant to which stock-based compensation was outstanding or could be granted. The Company’s 1987 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan authorized 5,850,000 shares for the granting of options to officers and key employees. The 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan and 2004 Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan authorized 1,500,000 and 1,350,000 shares, respectively, for the granting of various forms of equity-based awards, including restricted stock and stock options to officers and key employees. The 1999 Plan has expired as to the ability to grant new awards.
The following table presents the number of options and shares of restricted stock initially authorized and available for grant under each of the plans:
|
1987 |
|
1999 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Total |
Options and/or restricted stock initially authorized |
5,850,000 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
1,350,000 |
|
8,700,000 |
Options and/or restricted stock available for grant: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
18,627 |
|
- |
|
627,872 |
|
646,499 |
April 30, 2011 |
19,677 |
|
- |
|
628,621 |
|
648,298 |
In accordance with ASC 718, the fair value of current restricted stock awards is estimated on the date of grant based on the market price of the Company’s stock and is amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the related vesting periods. As of April 30, 2011 and May 1, 2010, there was $5.4 million and $8.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards, which have a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.1 years and 3.1 years, respectively. The total fair value of the shares recognized as compensation expense during the first quarter ended April 30, 2011 was $467,000 compared to $454,000 for the first quarter ended May 1, 2010. These expenses are classified as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
10
NOTE 6 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED):
The following summary shows the changes in the shares of restricted stock outstanding during the three months ended April 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
Shares |
|
|
Value Per Share |
Restricted stock awards at January 29, 2011 |
509,456 |
|
$ |
20.32 |
Vested |
(183) |
|
|
20.90 |
Forfeited or expired |
(750) |
|
|
20.07 |
Restricted stock awards at April 30, 2011 |
508,523 |
|
$ |
20.32 |
The Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan allows eligible full-time employees to purchase a limited number of shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock during each semi-annual offering period at a 15% discount through payroll deductions. During the three months ended April 30, 2011 and May 1, 2010, the Company sold 10,616 and 11,363 shares to employees at an average discount of $3.66 and $2.99 per share, respectively, under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The compensation expense recognized for the 15% discount given under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan was approximately $39,000 and $34,000 for the three months ended April 30, 2011 and May 1, 2010, respectively. These expenses are classified as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses.
The following is a summary of the changes in stock options outstanding during the three months ended April 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
|
Value(a) |
|
Options outstanding at January 29, 2011 |
21,675 |
|
$ |
13.86 |
|
2.78 years |
|
$ |
228,434 |
|
Granted |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Forfeited or expired |
1,050 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Exercised |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2011 |
20,625 |
|
$ |
13.96 |
|
2.41 years |
|
$ |
215,001 |
|
Vested and exercisable at April 30, 2011 |
20,625 |
|
$ |
13.96 |
|
2.41 years |
|
$ |
215,001 |
|
|
||||||||||
(a) The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
11
NOTE 6 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED):
No options were granted in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 or fiscal 2010. No options were exercised in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the first quarter ended April 30, 2011 was $0 compared to $158,000 for the prior year quarter ended May 1, 2010.
The Company recognized additional share-based compensation expense of $0 and $2,000 for the first quarter ended April 30, 2011 and May 1, 2010, respectively. These amounts are classified as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Stock option awards outstanding under the Company’s current plans were granted at exercise prices which were equal to the market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, vest over five years and expire no later than ten years after the grant date.
NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES:
For the quarter ended April 30, 2011, the Company’s effective tax rate was 35.7% compared to 36.9% for the prior year quarter ended May 1, 2010. The current year quarter was impacted by the reduction of a reserve for certain unrecognized tax benefits from the closing of a state income tax audit. During the next 12 months, various taxing authorities’ statutes of limitations are expected to expire which could result in a potential reduction of unrecognized tax benefits. In addition, certain state examinations may close, the ultimate resolution of which could materially affect the effective tax rate. As a consequence, the balance in unrecognized tax benefits can be expected to fluctuate from period to period. It is reasonably possible such changes could be significant when compared to our total unrecognized tax benefits, but the amount of change is not currently estimable.
12
NOTE 8 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
The following tables set forth information regarding the Company’s financial assets that are measured at fair value (in thousands) as of April 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
Description |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State/Municipal Bonds |
|
$ |
132,262 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
132,262 |
|
$ |
- |
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
31,946 |
|
|
- |
|
|
31,946 |
|
|
- |
Auction Rate Securities (ARS) |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,450 |
Variable Rate Demand Notes (VRDN) |
|
|
17,769 |
|
|
17,769 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
US Treasury Notes |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Privately Managed Funds |
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,937 |
Corporate Equities |
|
|
506 |
|
|
506 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Certificates of Deposit |
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
189,024 |
|
$ |
19,429 |
|
$ |
164,208 |
|
$ |
5,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
January 29, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
Description |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State/Municipal Bonds |
|
$ |
129,678 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
129,678 |
|
$ |
- |
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
34,288 |
|
|
- |
|
|
34,288 |
|
|
- |
Auction Rate Securities (ARS) |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,450 |
Variable Rate Demand Notes (VRDN) |
|
|
19,308 |
|
|
19,308 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Privately Managed Funds |
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,925 |
Corporate Equities |
|
|
480 |
|
|
480 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
189,129 |
|
$ |
19,788 |
|
$ |
163,966 |
|
$ |
5,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
NOTE 8 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED):
The Company’s investment portfolio was primarily invested in tax exempt variable rate demand notes (“VRDN”), corporate bonds, and governmental debt securities held in managed funds with underlying ratings of A or better at both April 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011. The underlying securities have contractual maturities which generally range from 50 days to 30 years. Although the Company’s investments in VRDN’s have underlying securities with contractual maturities longer than one year, the VRDN’s themselves have interest rate resets of 7 days and are considered short-term investments. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded as short-term investments on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Additionally, at April 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, the Company had $1.9 million of privately managed funds, $0.5 million of corporate equities and a single auction rate security (“ARS”) of $3.5 million which continues to fail its auction. All of these assets are recorded within Other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Level 1 category securities are measured at fair value using quoted active market prices. Level 2 investment securities include corporate and municipal bonds for which quoted prices may not be available on active exchanges for identical instruments. Their fair value is principally based on market values determined by management with assistance of a third party pricing service. Since quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are not available, these prices are determined by the pricing service using observable market information such as quotes from less active markets and/or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, among other factors.
The Company’s failed ARS is measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs at each reporting period. Because there is no active market for this particular ARS, its fair value was determined through the use of a discounted cash flow analysis. The terms used in the analysis were based on management’s estimate of the timing of future liquidity, which assumes that the security will be called or refinanced by the issuer or settled with a broker dealer prior to maturity. The discount rates used in the discounted cash flow analysis were based on market rates for similar liquid tax exempt securities with comparable ratings and maturities. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future liquidity, the Company also considered a liquidity/risk value reduction. In estimating the fair value of this ARS, the Company also considered the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, the probability that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the security and whether the security has been downgraded by a rating agency. The Company’s valuation is sensitive to market conditions and management’s judgment and can change significantly based on the assumptions used.
The Company has two privately managed funds. The privately managed funds cannot be redeemed at net asset value at a specific date without advance notice. As a result, the Company has classified the investments as Level 3.
14
NOTE 8 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED):
The following tables summarize the change in the fair value of the Company’s financial assets measured using Level 3 inputs during the first three months of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant |
|||||||
|
|
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||
|
Available-For-Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Debt Securities |
|
Other Investments |
|
|
|
|||
|
ARS |
|
|
Private Equity |
|
Total |
|||
Beginning Balance at January 29, 2011 |
$ |
3,450 |
|
|
$ |
1,925 |
|
$ |
5,375 |
Total gains or (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
Ending Balance at April 30, 2011 |
$ |
3,450 |
|
|
$ |
1,937 |
|
$ |
5,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant |
|||||||
|
|
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||
|
Available-For-Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Debt Securities |
|
Other Investments |
|
|
|
|||
|
ARS |
|
|
Private Equity |
|
Total |
|||
Beginning Balance at January 30, 2010 |
$ |
3,450 |
|
|
$ |
1,940 |
|
$ |
5,390 |
Total gains or (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
21 |
Ending Balance at May 1, 2010 |
$ |
3,450 |
|
|
$ |
1,961 |
|
$ |
5,411 |
15
NOTE 9 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
In January 2011, the Company adopted accounting guidance regarding changes to disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. For fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), the guidance requires a reporting entity to present separate information about gross purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.
16
THE CATO CORPORATION |
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
|
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION:
The following information should be read along with the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, including the accompanying Notes appearing in this report. Any of the following are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: (1) statements in this Form 10-Q that reflect projections or expectations of our future financial or economic performance; (2) statements that are not historical information; (3) statements of our beliefs, intentions, plans and objectives for future operations, including those contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”; (4) statements relating to our operations or activities for fiscal 2011 and beyond, including, but not limited to, statements regarding expected amounts of capital expenditures and store openings (including the launch of the new Versona Accessories store concept), relocations, remodels and closures; and (5) statements relating to our future contingencies. When possible, we have attempted to identify forward-looking statements by using words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “approximates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “hopes,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “should” and variations of such words and similar expressions. We can give no assurance that actual results or events will not differ materially from those expressed or implied in any such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us as of the filing date of this report, but subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following: general economic conditions, including, but not limited to, the continuation or worsening of (i) the current adverse or recessionary conditions affecting the U.S. and global economies and consumer spending and (ii) the adverse conditions in the U.S. and global credit markets; uncertainties regarding the impact of any governmental responses to the foregoing adverse economic and credit market conditions; competitive factors and pricing pressures; our ability to predict fashion trends; consumer apparel and accessory buying patterns; adverse weather conditions; inventory risks due to shifts in market demand; and other factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 (“fiscal 2010”), as amended or supplemented, and in other reports we file with or furnish to the SEC from time to time. We do not undertake, and expressly decline, any obligation to update any such forward-looking information contained in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
17
THE CATO CORPORATION |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL |
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
|
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
The Company’s accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. As disclosed in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, workers’ compensation, general and auto insurance liabilities, group health insurance, litigation, calculation of asset impairment, store closings, inventory shrinkage and uncertain tax positions.
The Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis.
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE:
The Company elected to change its method of accounting for inventory to the weighted average cost method from the retail method effective January 30, 2011. In accordance with ASC 250 “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, all periods have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the period specific effects of the change to the weighted average cost method. The company believes that the weighted average cost method better matches cost of sales with related sales, as well as having an inventory valuation that more closely reflects the acquisition cost of inventory by valuing inventory on a unit basis verses the product department level under the retail method. The cumulative adjustment as of January 31, 2010, was an increase in inventory of $11.7 million and an increase in retained earnings of $7.3 million.
Additionally, the Company has changed the classification for certain balance sheet items to conform to the 2011 presentation. This change in classification will reduce accounts payable and inventory by $1.6 million as of January 29, 2011 and $0.6 million as of May 1, 2010.
In addition, the Company has changed the classification of certain prior year first quarter income statement items to conform to the 2011 presentation. The change has no effect on net income; however, it does reduce retail sales by $720,000, cost of goods sold by $241,000 and selling, general and administrative expense by $479,000.
See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for details regarding the effects of the change in accounting principle and revised classifications on prior periods.
18
THE CATO CORPORATION |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL |
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items in the Company's unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as a percentage of total retail sales:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||
|
April 30, 2011 |
|
May 1, 2010 |
||
Total retail sales |
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
Other income |
1.0 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
Total revenues |
101.0 |
|
|
101.1 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
58.5 |
|
|
57.9 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
23.4 |
|
|
26.3 |
|
Depreciation |
2.0 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
Interest and other income |
(0.4) |
|
|
(0.3) |
|
Income before income taxes |
17.5 |
|
|
15.3 |
|
Net income |
11.3 |
|
|
9.7 |
|
19
THE CATO CORPORATION |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL |
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (CONTINUED):
Comparison of First Quarter of 2011 with 2010
Total retail sales for the first quarter were $270.9 million compared to last year’s first quarter sales of $259.0 million, a 4.6% increase. Same-store sales increased 2.0% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 due to favorable tax refund timing and favorable weather. Total revenues, comprised of retail sales and other income (principally, finance charges and late fees on customer accounts receivable and layaway fees), were $273.7 million for the first quarter ended April 30, 2011, compared to $262.0 million for the first quarter ended May 1, 2010. The Company operated 1,282 stores at April 30, 2011 compared to 1,272 stores at the end of last year’s first quarter. For the first three months of fiscal 2011 the Company opened four new stores, relocated one store and closed four stores. The Company expects to open approximately 54 stores, relocate seven stores and close approximately 27 stores in fiscal 2011.
Credit revenue of $2.0 million represented 0.7% of total revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to 2010 credit revenue of $2.2 million or 0.8% of total revenues. Credit revenue decreased for the most recent comparable period due to lower finance charge income and lower late fee income from sales under the Company’s proprietary credit card. Credit revenue is comprised of interest earned on the Company’s private label credit card portfolio and related fee income. Related expenses include principally bad debt expense, payroll, postage and other administrative expenses and totaled $1.3 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared to last year’s first quarter expenses of $1.6 million. The decrease was primarily due to lower bad debt and postage expenses compared to the first quarter of 2010.
Other income in total, as included in total revenues, was $2.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $2.9 million for the prior year’s comparable first quarter. The slight overall decrease resulted primarily from lower finance and late fee charges partially offset by an increase in layaway charges.
Cost of goods sold was $158.4 million, or 58.5% of retail sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $149.9 million, or 57.9% of retail sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The overall increase in cost of goods sold as a percent of retail sales for the first quarter of 2011 resulted primarily from higher freight costs and product mix changes partially offset by lower vendor allowances. Cost of goods sold includes merchandise costs, net of discounts and allowances, buying costs, distribution costs, occupancy costs, freight and inventory shrinkage. Net merchandise costs and in-bound freight are capitalized as inventory costs. Buying and distribution costs include payroll, payroll-related costs and operating expenses for the buying departments and distribution center. Occupancy expenses include rent, real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance, utilities and maintenance for stores and distribution facilities. Total gross margin dollars (retail sales less cost of goods sold) increased by 3.0% to $112.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to $109.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Gross margin as presented may not be comparable to those of other entities.
20
THE CATO CORPORATION |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL |
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (CONTINUED):
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) primarily include corporate and store payroll, related payroll taxes and benefits, insurance, supplies, advertising, bank and credit card processing fees and bad debts. SG&A expenses were $63.3 million, or 23.4% of retail sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $68.1 million, or 26.3% of retail sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. SG&A expenses as a percentage of retail sales decreased 290 basis points for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to incentive-based compensation expenses, group health insurance expenses, and workers’ compensation expenses, slightly offset by higher payroll and legal costs.
Depreciation expense was $5.4 million, or 2.0% of retail sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $5.3 million, or 2.0% of retail sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The slight increase in depreciation expense was due to store development and information technology investments.
Interest and other income was $1.0 million, or 0.4% of retail sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $0.9 million, or 0.3% of retail sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to higher interest income due to an increase in cash and short-term investments.
Income tax expense was $17.0 million or 6.3% of retail sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $14.6 million, or 5.6% of retail sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The first quarter increase resulted from higher pre-tax income partially offset by a slightly lower effective tax rate. The effective income tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was 35.7% compared to 36.9% for the first quarter of 2010. The current year quarter was impacted by the reduction of a reserve for certain unrecognized tax benefits from the closing of a state income tax audit.
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND MARKET RISK:
The Company has consistently maintained a strong liquidity position. Cash provided by operating activities during the first three months of fiscal 2011 was $43.0 million as compared to $33.5 million in the first three months of fiscal 2010. These amounts enable the Company to fund its regular operating needs, capital expenditure program, cash dividend payments, and share repurchases. In addition, the Company maintains a $35.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility for short-term financing of seasonal cash needs. There were no outstanding borrowings on this facility at April 30, 2011.
Cash provided by operating activities for the first three months of fiscal 2011 was primarily generated by earnings adjusted for depreciation and changes in working capital. The increase of $9.5 million for the first three months of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first three months of fiscal 2010 was primarily due to an increase in net income, a change in inventories, and accrued income taxes partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable.
The Company believes that its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, together with cash flows from operations will be adequate to fund the Company’s dividends, share repurchases, other operating requirements and expected capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 and for the foreseeable future.
21
THE CATO CORPORATION |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL |
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
|
|
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND MARKET RISK (CONTINUED):
At April 30, 2011, the Company had working capital of $275.8 million compared to $231.3 million at May 1, 2010. Additionally, the Company had $2.4 million invested in privately managed investment funds and other miscellaneous equities and a single auction rate security of $3.5 million at April 30, 2011, which are included in Other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
At April 30, 2011, the Company had an unsecured revolving credit agreement, which provides for borrowings of up to $35.0 million. The revolving credit agreement is committed until August 2013. The credit agreement contains various financial covenants and limitations, including the maintenance of specific financial ratios with which the Company was in compliance as of April 30, 2011. There were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility during the first quarter ended April 30, 2011.
At April 30, 2011 and May 1, 2010, the Company had approximately $2.9 million and $4.4 million, respectively, of outstanding irrevocable letters of credit relating to purchase commitments.
Expenditures for property and equipment totaled $4.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $4.0 million in last year’s first quarter. The expenditures for the first three months of 2011 were primarily for the development of four new stores and additional investments in new technology. For the full fiscal 2011 year, the Company expects to invest approximately $32.3 million for capital expenditures. This includes expenditures to open 54 new stores and relocate seven stores, upgrades to merchandise systems, and home office and distribution center expansion.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $2.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to $22.6 million used in the comparable period of 2010. The decrease was due primarily to the decrease in purchases of short-term investments.
On May 26, 2011, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend by 24% from $.185 per share to $.23 per share or an annualized rate of $.92 per share.
As of April 30, 2011, the Company had 332,942 shares remaining in the share repurchase program. There is no specified expiration date for the Company’s repurchase program. For the three months ended April 30, 2011, the Company repurchased 110,000 shares at an average cost of $23.48 per share.
The Company does not use derivative financial instruments.
22
THE CATO CORPORATION |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL |
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
|
|
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND MARKET RISK (CONTINUED):
The Company’s investment portfolio was primarily invested in tax exempt variable rate demand notes (“VRDN”), corporate bonds, and governmental debt securities held in managed funds with underlying ratings of A or better at both April 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011. The underlying securities have contractual maturities which generally range from 50 days to 30 years. Although the Company’s investments in VRDN’s have underlying securities with contractual maturities longer than one year, the VRDN’s themselves have interest rate resets of 7 days and are considered short-term investments. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded as short-term investments on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated balance Sheets at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Additionally, at April 30, 2011, the Company had $1.9 million of privately managed funds, $0.5 million of corporate equities and a single auction rate security (“ARS”) of $3.5 million which continues to fail its auction. See Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements for further information regarding the failed ARS. All of these assets are recorded within Other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Information regarding new accounting pronouncements is provided in Note 9 to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
23
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK:
The Company is subject to market rate risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on its financing, investing and cash management activities, but the Company does not believe such exposure is material.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES:
We carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of April 30, 2011. Based on this evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of April 30, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING:
No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) has occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting except for the change in accounting principle to the weighted average cost method from the retail method for inventory accounting.
24
Not Applicable
In addition to the other information in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. These risks could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results; however, they are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table summarizes the Company’s purchases of its common stock for the three months ended April 30, 2011:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
(or Approximate Dollar |
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Value) of Shares that may |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Yet be Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share (1) |
|
|
Programs (2) |
|
The Plans or Programs (2) |
February 2011 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
March 2011 |
|
110,000 |
|
$ |
23.48 |
|
$ |
110,000 |
|
|
April 2011 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total |
|
110,000 |
|
$ |
23.48 |
|
$ |
110,000 |
|
332,942 |
(1) Prices include trading costs.
(2) The Company’s Board of Director’s authorized an increase in the Company’s share repurchase program of 500,000 shares on February 26, 2009. As of January 29, 2011, the Company’s share repurchase program had 442,942 shares remaining in open authorizations. During the first quarter ending April 30, 2011, the Company repurchased and retired 110,000 shares under this program for approximately $2.6 million or an average market price of $23.48 per share. As of the first quarter ending April 30, 2011, the Company had 332,942 shares remaining in open authorizations. There is no specified expiration date for the Company’s repurchase program.
Not Applicable
25
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Removed and Reserved
Not Applicable
Exhibit No. |
|
Item |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Registrant’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated March 6, 1987, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-8 of the Registrant filed February 7, 2000 (SEC File No. 333-96283). |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Registrant’s By Laws incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.2 to Form |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Rights Agreement dated December 18, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-A12G of the Registrant filed December 22, 2003 and as amended in Form 8-A12B/A filed January 6, 2004. |
|
|
|
18.1* |
|
Letter regarding change in accounting principle from PricewaterhouseCoopers, dated June 8, 2011, to the Board of Directors of The Cato Corporation regarding the preferability of change in accounting principal from the Retail Method to the Cost Method. |
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
32.2* |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
* Filed herein.
26
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE CATO CORPORATION
June 8, 2011 |
|
/s/ John P. D. Cato |
Date |
|
John P. D. Cato Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
June 8, 2011 |
|
/s/ John R. Howe |
Date |
|
John R. Howe Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer |
27
June 8, 2011 EXHIBIT 18.1
The Cato Corporation
8100 Denmark Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Dear Directors:
We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
We have been provided a copy of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2011. Note 1 therein describes a change in accounting principle for inventory. It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for inventory has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management’s determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management’s stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company’s circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Standards Codification 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to January 29, 2011. Accordingly, our comments are subject to change upon completion of an audit of the financial statements covering the period of the accounting change.
Very truly yours,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
28
EXHIBIT 31.1
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, John P. D. Cato, certify that:
|
|
|
1. |
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of The Cato Corporation (the “registrant”); |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, |
|
|
|
|
4. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures |
|
|
|
|
b) |
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
|
c) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end |
|
|
|
|
d) |
Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that |
5. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a |
|
Date: June 8, 2011
/s/ John P. D. Cato |
John P. D. Cato Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
29
EXHIBIT 31.2
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, John R. Howe, certify that:
|
|
|
1. |
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of The Cato Corporation (the “registrant”); |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, |
|
|
|
|
4. |
The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures |
|
|
|
|
b) |
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
|
c) |
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end |
|
|
|
|
d) |
Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that |
5. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) |
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a |
|
Date: June 8, 2011
/s/ John R. Howe |
John R. Howe Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer |
30
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Cato Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:
1. the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: June 8, 2011
|
|
|
/s/ John P. D. Cato |
|
John P. D. Cato |
|
Chairman, President and |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
31
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
I, John R. Howe, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of The Cato Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:
1. the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
Dated: June 8, 2011
|
|
|
/s/ John R. Howe |
|
John R. Howe |
|
Executive Vice President |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
32